![]() Stellar also provides a bootable recovery toolkit, which is one of the easiest ways to restore data from a non-booting drive. Both Disk Drill and Stellar Data Recovery offer this useful tool. These features typically make the user’s life easier or address more complex data loss problems.īyte-to-byte backup is one of our most looked-for features because it allows users to restore data from an image backup of their drive rather than the drive itself (and risk further damage and/or data loss). Many data recovery software include additional features in their apps that add value for the user. But the difference in the number of data recovered makes Disk Drill the clear winner of the overall challenge. ![]() Stellar, on the other hand, proved reliable for most Microsoft Office file types and even restored some OpenOffice files. Disk Drill only missed a single file type (.accdb) and even restored a decent amount of Apple and OpenOffice data. The last round of the real-life recovery challenge had both software tools restore as many documents as they could of varying file types. It also does not support any of the formats that Disk Drill struggles with, making the latter the clear winner so far. Even if it recognized a similar number of video formats as it did during the photo recovery challenge, it provided limited support for even the most common video formats such as. Stellar Data Recovery performed worse this round. However, don’t expect to restore files of the following types. Most common formats are supported of those formats, Disk Drill recovered most of our data. Users of common manufacturers like Kodak, Sony, Olympus, and Fujifilm can expect to restore most of their data.įor the video recovery challenge, Disk Drill again produced excellent results. And of those file types, Stellar’s performance gave mixed results. In comparison, Stellar Data Recovery only worked with 21 out of the 37 RAW photo file types we tested. x3i, but the overall results are nonetheless highly impressive. And for the file types Disk Drill supported, it restored most of our data. It only missed 3 out of 37 file types specifically, it missed. Here’s the verdict:įor RAW photo recovery, Disk Drill is better. ![]() ![]() We divided the challenge into document, video, and RAW photo recovery. Do note that as of this writing, Disk Drill is offering licenses for both the Windows and Mac versions for the price of one.įor the real-life recovery challenge, we tally up how much data our featured software can restore according to commonly used file types. The Windows version of Disk Drill does not support EXT4, HFS+, and APFS formats, which is not important for this review. ![]() This was the case with all the partitions we tested including non-Windows-based formats. In fact, we couldn’t come up with conclusive data because it kept crashing! When it didn’t crash, it was able to restore some files – but we can’t judge it properly because the results were too inconsistent. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said about Stellar Data Recovery. It was able to restore the folder structure and file names of our Windows-based FAT32, exFAT, and NTFS partitions, and it recovered most of our files as well. Most data recovery software offer this feature but not all of them do it well.ĭisk Drill is one of the rare apps that produce consistently positive results. Aside from recovering data, a deep scan also attempts to restore a drive’s root folder structure and original file names. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |